Над 4 милиона заглавия на английски и други езици! Открийте новата си история още днес! Безплатна доставка за поръчки над 69.99€

Виж статуса на поръчката

Свържете се с нас

Judicial Evaluation

Name: Judicial Evaluation
Brand: VDM Verlag
SKU: 9783639069860
Price: 59.87 EUR
Availability: InStock

Traditions, Innovations and Proposals for Measuring the Quality of Court Performance

Автор: Francesco Contini, Richard Mohr

Език:

Корици: С меки корици

Издател: VDM Verlag

Наличност: Външен склад

Изпращаме след 9-15 дни

59.87 € 117.10 лв

Can courts and judges be evaluated? Or are the ideals§of justice incompatible with quality measureme...

Информация за книгата

Автор

Francesco Contini, Richard Mohr

Език

Английски език

Корици

Книга - С меки корици

Издадена

2008

страници

136

EAN

9783639069860

ISBN

3639069862

Enbook ID

06816292

Издател

VDM Verlag

Теглоt

191

Размери

152 x 229 x 7

Пълно описание

Can courts and judges be evaluated? Or are the ideals§of justice incompatible with quality measurement?§These questions are addressed by research into the§experience of nine European countries. Issues of§independence and accountability are analysed by§examining the role of the courts as a branch of§government that maintains legitimacy and authority as§well as providing a public service. This appreciation§broadens the conception of accountability, while§highlighting that independence is but a means to the§end of impartiality. The interests, values and§traditions of the law, public management and civil§society are each recognised as being relevant to§judicial evaluation. The criteria proposed for the§effective evaluation of courts include a respect for§the core values and roles of courts, a meaningful§place for all actors, including the public, and means§to ensure that evaluations have consequences in the§day to day operations of justice systems. Drawing on§practical examples, the book concludes with proposals§that may enhance impartiality, accountability and§democracy in the administration of justice. Can courts and judges be evaluated? Or are the ideals of justice incompatible with quality measurement? These questions are addressed by research into the experience of nine European countries. Issues of independence and accountability are analysed by examining the role of the courts as a branch of government that maintains legitimacy and authority as well as providing a public service. This appreciation broadens the conception of accountability, while highlighting that independence is but a means to the end of impartiality. The interests, values and traditions of the law, public management and civil society are each recognised as being relevant to judicial evaluation. The criteria proposed for the effective evaluation of courts include a respect for the core values and roles of courts, a meaningful place for all actors, including the public, and means to ensure that evaluations have consequences in the day to day operations of justice systems. Drawing on practical examples, the book concludes with proposals that may enhance impartiality, accountability and democracy in the administration of justice.