Над 4 милиона заглавия на английски и други езици! Открийте новата си история още днес! Безплатна доставка за поръчки над 69.99€

Виж статуса на поръчката

Свържете се с нас

Logic in Law

Name: Logic in Law
Brand: Springer
SKU: 9789048140350
Price: 372.84 EUR
Availability: InStock

Remarks on Logic and Rationality in Normative Reasoning, Especially in Law

Автор: A. Soeteman

Език:

Корици: С меки корици

Издател: Springer

Наличност: Външен склад

Изпращаме след 10-18 дни

372.84 € 729.21 лв

The study presented in this book was entered upon by me from a legal point of view. 'Legal logic' ha...

Информация за книгата

Автор

A. Soeteman

Език

Английски език

Корици

Книга - С меки корици

Издадена

2010

страници

326

EAN

9789048140350

ISBN

9048140358

Enbook ID

01973187

Издател

Springer

Теглоt

515

Размери

152 x 229 x 19

Пълно описание

The study presented in this book was entered upon by me from a legal point of view. 'Legal logic' has been known for a long time, concerning itself with the methodology of legal and in particular judicial reasoning. In modern days, however, this 'legal logic' is sometimes also connected with modern formal logic, as it has been developed in the works of G. Boole, A. de Morgan, G. Frege, C.S. Peirce, E. Schroder, G. Peano, A.N. Whitehead, B. Russell and others. For me this gave rise to the as yet not very specific question about the meaning of modern symbolic logic for law. Already in an early stage it appeared that, although traditional legal logic and modern symbolic logic both concern logic, this may not create the misapprehension that a similar matter is at issue. Both concern themselves (among other things) with reasonings and reasoning. Traditional legal logic is, however, as it was said by the German legal theoretician K. Engisch: "a material logic that wants us to reflect on what we have to do if we -within the limits of actual possibility- wish to reach true, or at least correct judgements" (Engisch, 1964, p.5). Modern symbolic logic on the other hand is not concerned with the truth or correctness of the result of an argument, but with its validity, i.e. the question when or under which conditions the truth (correctness) of the conclusion is guaranteed by the truth (correctness) of the premisses.